Posts

Herbert Armstrong - Do festivals of Leviticus have to be observed by Christians?

There are some - including Armstrong’s Worldwide Church of God and its many offshoots - that make the claim their observation of such days, and of the ten commandments including sabbath, are important identifiers of their system being special. So special one also reads claims it is the one true church. There are booklets where they link themselves all the way back to the first century wherein the observation of such days be an important part of the aforementioned claim. There are others such as groups in the Jewish Messianic movements and various other who also argue festivals be required. In t his link to a Post in Quora I examine whether Armstrong's claims are supported in scriptures.   To be clear, people are of course free to observe any days they choose, and that choice deserves respect. The problem arises when the claim is made that such observance marks their system as the one true church. Many of the offshoots still publish booklets tracing their lineage back to the f...

Herbert Armstrong - Feast Days in Millennium - Zechariah ch 14

 Zechariah chapter 14 is seen by certain groups as evidence that feast days are to be observed in the Millennium.  Indeed, I once thought so myself : 16  Then everyone who survives of all the nations that have come against Jerusalem shall go up year after year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to keep the Feast of Booths. 17 And if any of the families of the earth do not go up to Jerusalem to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, there will be no rain on them. 18 And if the family of Egypt does not go up and present themselves, then on them there shall be no rain; there shall be the plague with which the LORD afflicts the nations that do not go up to keep the Feast of Booths. 19 This shall be the punishment to Egypt and the punishment to all the nations that do not go up to keep the Feast of Booths. This Post in Quor a examines the issue - seeking to decide whether such idea has any biblical merit. The link takes you to a re-direct page, being the Quora post i r...

Herbert Armstrong - Revelation 22 v 14 - the claim it refers to the Ten Commandments

  Revelation chapter 22 verse 14 reads: [ Rev 22:14 KJV] 14 Blessed [are] they that  do his commandments , that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. I have observed how certain denominations particularly those who demand sabbath observance -as this they say is the sign of a true believer - choose to interpret the verse in question.   Indeed, one reads in their literature statements such as :  ‘ I t is only those who are willing to DO the Ten Commandments who shall enter in thru the gates into the City ’. Revelation 22:14 thereby becomes one of the most mis‑used verses by groups that teach salvation-by-law, especially Sabbatarian groups. The boast be made this identifies the one true church. In this Post in Quora I examine just what commandments/commands are in fact the subject of this verse in Revelation 22. 

Herbert Armstrong: Three days and Three nights - Matthew chapter 12

Does Matthew chapter 12 concerning Jesus’s resurrection and the “sign” of Jonah have to mean exactly 72 hours? Please note in a separate Post I have addressed the Wednesday crucifixion theory. This Armstrong doctrine is used to criticize the 'world's churches' for celebrating the Friday crucifixion.  I found there are no strong grounds for Wednesday and set out the reasons.  This particular blog focusses on Matthew 12,   ‘’ For just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the sea monster, so shall the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth” These words are the basis of a theory which holds that Jesus was crucified on a Wednesday, and resurrected exactly 72 hours later on the sabbath towards sunset. Whether it was a historical fact that Jonah did spend exactly seventy two hours inside a large fish we of course do not know. Jesus referred to this event, but He does not state explicitly that His citation affirms the historical c...

Herbert Armstrong - A comparison of Herbert Armstrong & Joseph Rutherford of the Jehovah Witnesses

Some interesting similarities between Herbert W. Armstrong and Joseph F. Rutherford are worthy of note. Armstrong claimed he was an apostle and special messenger appointed to warn “Israel” (USA/UK/other Anglo nations) and the world of end‑time disasters, insisting that his Radio/Worldwide Church of God was the one true church . He taught that only he proclaimed the true gospel, while all other churches were deceived by Satan. Armstrong also said he governed the church by “God’s Government”: God the Father, then Jesus Christ, then Armstrong himself. Rutherford did not use the title “apostle,” but the effect was the same. He taught that Christ inspected all religions in 1918, chose the Watch Tower Society in 1919, and directed the “work” through its President. In this sense Rutherford mirrored Armstrong’s claims about divine authority and God’s government. What we see, therefore, are two contemporaries - living in the USA, at times only 200 km apart - each demanding recognition as God’s...

Herbert Armstrong - the Book of Romans

This book is one of the greatest ever written. All I can hope is bring out, in this post, teachings that stand out to me. It helps to express them in writing so as to come back to it now and again to re-evaluate. Please click here to go to my Post in Quora wherein I seek to understand its purpose and how it informs of the Gospel messag e.  I also seek to understand particular verses that some use to almost undo the very purpose of the book itself.   Edit: Why do I make the label Herbert Armstrong apply in this Post. My answer is that he was one of those who select certain verses from Romans and use them to undo the very message it contains. I explain these verses in some detail in context of the whole book of Romans. 

Herbert Armstrong - teaching of a pagan cross

Herbert Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God promoted the idea that the cross is pagan.  I note that the Jehovah Witnesses have the same belief - they insist Jesus dies on a stake rather than a cross, and allege the cross is of pagan origin.   I would not at all be surprised if Armstrong took his idea from the Witnesses, he was after all a great copyist. Perhaps many in the Millerite movement held such belief.  The purpose of this pagan theory is, I believe, to denigrate and unsettle believers whilst promoting other pagan theories such as those concerning Christmas, Easter and Sunday worship.  I investigate whether these claims are true, and conclude they have no substance.  Please follow the link to my post in Quora.  See here.